Saturday, April 21, 2012

A Beautiful Dream




Jean Arp 

I slept very well last night, in fact we both slept so well, that we didn't wake up until gone 13.00 this afternoon.

It was quite a surprise to find most of the day already gone, and the afternoon went by very quickly too, especially because Richie had to shower me.

Still very upset about reading the article in the Guardian recently about the King of Spain going on an elephant shooting safari in Botswana.

What a moronic idiot he seems to be, but not surprising just another example of the arrogance, as well as stupidity of these inbred elites, such as the long established royal families.

Not only has the King shown a remarkable lack of judgement, but has also revealed himself to be an astonishing hypocrite.

Just before it was revealed that he'd broken his hip, while on safari, he had let it be known that he couldn't sleep at night because he was so worried about what was to become of the youth of Spain because of the economic crisis.

Yet days later it was revealed that he was on a £10,000 day safari, which was paid for by the Syrian businessman, there have subsequently been revelations of corruption and sexual intrigues to make him even less popular with the Spanish people.

Maybe the population is so angry with the monarchy that they will try to get rid of them, and revert to being a Republican country.

There was some very good news today, in the Dutch papers that the coalition government of VVD and CDA with the PVV had collapsed.          .

Which is brilliant news as the coalition was only kept in business because it was shored up by the PVV and a couple of other far right parties.

The coalition partners could not come to an agreement as to the cuts and the policies they would adopt.

We shall hear any day that there'll be new elections soon, when once again ‘the musical chairs’ will begin and whoever is sitting when the music stops will be the newly elected government.

Isn't democracy wonderful every four or five years the illusion gets played out for us all to get caught up thinking that our votes will really matter this time.

Personally I might believe that they did matter if there really was visible proof that the rich would share their wealth by paying all their taxes and the world’s vast natural resources will be shared equally among the populations of the world.

It is very important to me, that while I started my blog, to write about how my diagnosis of multiple sclerosis has affected my life, I also write about other things.

I've always been someone who is very interested in a wide range of issues, and in world affairs, having MS does not mean that suddenly my whole focus is going to be about this horrible disease and nothing else.

I refuse to be identified by only one aspect of my life, just as I've always refused to be identified by purely the work I did, I just like everybody else, have many facets to my personality.

If only we could get rid of this capitalist system, which has no need for any of us to be anything other than workers, who make the wealth of the rich to live at the expense of those that actually do the work.

Then we would not just be identified by the work we do, we could also be identified by our many skills and talents, and allow us to become fully rounded human beings in touch with our communities and the world we live in.

Right now it's a beautiful dream which I hope will happen one day, so that this wonderful world can finally really be a paradise for all of us to enjoy freely.











Billionaire superyachts cast a shadow over Barcelona's traditional barrios

Residents of a working-class district near the port battle to block British plan to create a marina for the mega-rich.
Giles Tremlett in Barcelona
guardian.co.uk

The Port Vell in Barcelona’s traditional fishermen’s neighbourhood is at the centre of plans by the Mayfair-based Salamanca Group, a private investment fund, to bring the mega-rich to the heart of the city
The world's largest private yacht looms over the old port of Barcelona – its six-deck, 163m profile offering proof of the love of Russian billionaire Roman Abramovich for a city he will visit again this week as his football team, Chelsea, tries to secure a place in the Champions League finals.
But the superyacht, equipped with its own mini-submarine and anti-paparazzi shield, is a symbol of what neighbours in the traditional fishermen's neighbourhood of La Barceloneta fear will bring about the demise of one of the few city centre barrios to have maintained its traditional working-class character. Old Barcelona is under threat. A British private investment fund has taken control of much of the port area and has asked for an extended licence so that it can turn the Marina Port Vell into the Mediterranean's prime home for superyachts. Sources close to the group said it wanted the licence to run until 2036.
The Mayfair-based Salamanca Group intends to make the marina home to yachts up to 180 metres long, bringing the planet's growing club of mega-rich to a marina that it says "dominates the heart of Barcelona". But Barceloneta residents say the boats will dwarf the neighbourhood's famously narrow, four- or five-storey blocks of flats, where working-class families live in tiny homes and colourful outdoor washing lines leave the neighbourhood's laundry on public display.
"I've lived here all my life and the barrio has a special identity, precisely because so many working-class people have always lived here," said 68-year-old pensioner Antonio García, of the L'Ostia neighbourhood group. "But this will price us out, turning the port into a place only for the very rich and changing things for ever."
Neighbours fear that a huge wall may go up around part of the port to ensure the privacy of a handful of wealthy people, creating a fortress-like billionaires' ghetto on their doorstep. Protesters have already taken to Barceloneta's narrow streets, demanding that speculators be kept away from an area renowned for its cheap seafood restaurants and proximity to Barcelona's colourful urban beach.
"This will make it even more touristy and will see us expelled from our own barrio. We want it as it has always been, a real community of working-class people with roots right here," said García.
Most of Barcelona's fishing fleet disappeared years ago, but the area also had factories and most people worked in manufacturing. Barceloneta was also a centre of popular culture, with the city's own version of the rumba dance emerging here. The rundown area was partially redeveloped, along with the old port, for the 1992 Olympics, but it survived the gentrification of other parts of the old town. "The flats here are too small for the wealthier people from around Europe who have moved into other parts of the city," explained García. "That has saved us so far, but now people are buying them up to rent out as holiday apartments."
Salamanca took over the marina in 2010. The company is run by founder Martin Bellamy, a former army officer. Last year it claimed that work on the marina would be completed this autumn. But a city hall spokeswoman said that only after Salamanca had received an extended licence from the Spanish government would Barcelona's authorities be able to review the project and decide whether to hand out its own permits. "This will have a landscape impact on Barcelona and so will have to be studied closely," said Rosa Díaz. "The city hall approves in principle of a large investment that might generate jobs and bring wealth, but it is not going to allow them to do whatever they like. And, of course, it will consult the neighbours."
Salamanca's Barcelona outpost declined to give figures for the amount of money it wants to invest. Nor would it respond publicly to the concerns of people in La Barceloneta.
Locals say some smaller boat owners, including those who live on their boats, are already being told they must leave the marina. A source close to Salamanca said this was because repair work had already started. Boat owners were being offered berths at cut-rate prices in nearby marinas, as well as a place on the waiting list to get back once work was finished.
Among possible solutions for multi-millionaires seeking privacy were temporary screens covering a glass or metal fence around part of the marina.
The huge project comes as Barcelona seeks to shed its reputation for cheap, drunken, stag-party tourism, with a recent law cracking down on street prostitutes in places such as the Las Ramblas boulevard.
Abramovich is rumoured to be a shareholder in a Barcelona refit and repair yard, MB92, that lies beside the marina and also plans to expand its facilities for superyachts.
The Marina Port Vell is not the only modernisation project in town. Barcelona is also competing with Madrid for the Eurovegas complex, a vast collection of hotels, casinos and conference centres that the Las Vegas-based gambling billionaire Sheldon Adelson wants to build in Spain.

Friday, April 20, 2012

Ramble On Levon




http://www.elviscostello.com/news/ramble-on-levon/303

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levon_Helm

http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2012/04/levon-helm-drummer-for-the-band-dies-at-71/

http://www.levonhelm.com/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOi0tC00Luc&feature=player_embedded

Spain's model monarchy shoots itself in the foot



King Juan Carlos's solidarity with austerity-hit subjects collapses amid hunting trips, corruption claims and bedroom intrigue

Giles Tremlett in Madrid
 
King Juan Carlos on his €10,000-a-day hunting safari in Botswana, which had been hushed up before he fell and broke his hip. Photograph: Target Press/Barcroft Media
They were once the star royal family of Europe, seen as hard-working, frugal, modern and genuinely popular among ordinary Spaniards who adored King Juan Carlos as the great bringer of democracy.
But now Spain's royals have revealed an ability to shoot themselves in the foot, both literally and metaphorically, in a way that has left angry citizens wondering if they even notice how ordinary people are suffering.
As unemployment reached 24%, austerity measures bit and the economy headed back towards double-dip recession, the 74-year-old monarch had publicly claimed he lay in bed at night worrying about the plight of the young jobless. But a fall as he walked to the bathroom in an exclusive safari camp in Botswana, where he had gone to shoot elephants, water buffaloes and other exotic animals, has revealed a different story.
While Spaniards desperately sought work or struggled to meet basic needs, the king was on a hush-hush, all-expenses-paid hunting trip, blasting at animals in one of the world's most exotic landscapes – Botswana's Okavango delta.
His big-game-slaying holiday was estimated to cost €10,000 (£8,000) a day, with a Syrian businessman close to the Saudi royal family rumoured to be picking up the tab.
It was not the kind of thing Spaniards wanted to hear as the government announced health and education cuts and fears grew of a bailout accompanied by years of harsh austerity.
"We all have to tighten our belts a bit because of the difficult times for the economy," the king had told them over the summer, as he backed austerity.
The hunting trip was just the latest in a series of gaffes which have seen Spain's normally respectful press tear up a decades-old deal not to scrutinise the royal family.
That agreement had stayed in place since Juan Carlos inherited General Francisco Franco's powers after the dictator's death in 1975 and oversaw the restoration of monarchy and democracy. His role in quashing a 1981 coup attempt appeared to cement his position.
In recent months, however, the king has struggled to separate the monarchy from a corruption scandal surrounding his son-in-law Iñaki Urdangarín, Duke of Palma.
The duke, a former Olympic medal winner with Spain's handball team, denies allegations that he used charities as fronts for taking millions of euros in public money, some of it hidden from tax authorities, so that he could cash in on his royal title by appearing at events alongside politicians.
"Everyone, especially those of us with public functions, must behave correctly, in an exemplary fashion," the king solemnly declared in his Christmas broadcast as the scandal snowballed and the monarchy's popularity tumbled in opinion polls.
He hired a new public relations chief, former El País columnist Javier Ayuso, with glowing pro-monarchy editorials appearing in the centre-left daily and other newspapers. The royal palace's accounts were also made public in what Spaniards were told was a new era of transparency.
But Juan Carlos's attempts at portraying his family as hard-working, humble and law-abiding had taken a blow when his 13-year-old grandson, Froilán Marichalar, shot himself through the foot with a 36-calibre shotgun just a few days before the Botswana incident.
Newspapers reported that Froilán was too young to use the shotgun legally, raising further questions about whether the royals felt normal rules did not apply to them.
"These people just don't understand the reality of this country," complained Mercedes Munarriz, a sound engineer. "They even seem to be running a perfect campaign against themselves."
But it was the king's Botswana fall, which required him to fly back for a hip operation in Madrid, that provoked an unprecedented torrent of criticism of a monarch unused to harsh words from the press or mainstream politicians.
"The king should choose between responsibility and abdication," said Tomás Gómez, head of Madrid's Socialist party, as pressure grew for Juan Carlos to make way for his son, Felipe.
"The African elephant scandal is not anecdotal," said Ignacio Escolar, one of Spain's most popular bloggers. "It cannot be so when the Spanish monarchy has spent months going from scandal to scandal, when the economic crisis makes Spaniards question all their institutions and when even his own family cannot escape the stain of corruption."
Even the king's private life, where rumours of lovers have always been rife, is no longer out of bounds – and neither is his friendship with a German aristocrat whose name is widely available in Spain and Germany, but whose lawyers say she denies any inappropriate relationship and have threatened legal action against any British newspapers that reveal her name.
"The failure of his marriage to Queen Sofia, from whom he is practically separated, is public knowledge," said José Antonio Zarzalejos, a former editor of the conservative ABC newspaper, in his online column.
Officials at the king's Zarzuela palace declined to say who had travelled with him or paid for a trip that they described as private, nor would they comment on his personal life.
A more ferocious debate was taking place on social networks and the internet. The World Wildlife Fund (WWF) said it had received more than 80,000 internet complaints against the king – its honorary president in Spain – for shooting elephants for fun.
"The impact is huge in Britain, Germany, Holland, the United States and other countries," said WWF Spain's boss, Juan Carlos del Olmo, explaining why it was considering sacking the king. "It is more of an image problem, both national and international, than a conservation question."
Palace officials said they had not been formally told of any plans by the WWF to break with the monarch.
Foreign Policy magazine blogger Joshua E Keating added to Spain's sense of humiliation by asking whether the king had deliberately sought the least politically correct holiday. "Was the baby-seal-clubbing junket all booked up?" he wondered.
The Spanish government has also received a deluge of requests that taxpayer funds given to the king should not be excluded from a new transparency law. All this pales, however, beside the latest allegations made by defence lawyers representing a business partner of the king's son-in-law.
This week they provided copies of emails which allegedly showed that Juan Carlos acted as an intermediary between Urdangarín and public officials, trying to persuade politicians to get involved with the creation of a new America's Cup sailing project. Urdangarín had allegedly hoped to earn money from it.
There was no suggestion the king had done anything illegal, though his status excludes him from the legal process anyway. Officials said the emails reflected his support for sailing, one of his family's favourite sports. The news magazine Interviú this week claimed anticorruption investigators are trying to find up to €5m allegedly kept in tax havens by Urdangarín – whose appearances in court have proved an embarrassment. On Wednesday the king appeared on his crutches to issue an 11-word apology for his behaviour. "I am very sorry. I made a mistake and it will not happen again," he said.
"I applaud the apology, but am left with a question. Exactly what is it that won't happen again?" asked Escolar.
Even ministers find themselves getting tangled up in the lexicon of royal gaffes, as the expression "shoot yourself in the foot" gains new significance in Madrid. The foreign minister, José Manuel García-Margallo, had to apologise for using it as a way of describing Argentina's nationalisation of the Spanish-owned oil company YPF this week. "It was an unfortunate expression," he said. "I meant no double-meaning."

Thursday, April 19, 2012

The Real Reason

Endre Rozsda 

Yesterday a very good day, I sat in a reasonably stable position, and needed only for Richie to reposition me once.

Unlike today, when I've needed him to move me several times, and then typically as soon as Richie and the dogs left at five, my position became very difficult to maintain.

I'm so glad that Richie and the dogs are back now, finally after two hours of sitting extremely badly and in much discomfort, I will be adjusted that so that  I can be comfortable.


It worked, but not for long because quite soon I was slumped once again, at 19.30 when Richie got me out of bed, we realised what the real reason was for my bad posture.

Once again it was all down to bowel movements, I desperately needed one so instead sitting in my wheelchair to do my exercises with the Motomed, I asked Richie to take me straight to the toilet.

Good thing to as I was desperate to have a crap, what a relief once it was over, it was huge and no wonder I was totally destabilised this afternoon.

No wonder I could not maintain my position, and also no wonder I was feeling quite miserable.

And actually started to cry at which point I called Richie and the rest is history now, because I'm back in bed having successfully done my exercises.

Bill Cossby's erasure of race from the Trayvon Martin case


Cosby is right that Trayvon Martin's murder is partly about US gun culture, but his overlooking racism is dangerous wishfulness

Actor Bill Cosby has insisted the Trayvon Martin case is primarily a problem of America's prevalent gun culture. Photograph: Paul Morigi/WireImage
In the last decade, legendary comedian, film and television star Bill Cosby has transformed himself from America's dad into a cultural critic determined to whip black America into shape. It started with what is now known as the "pound cake" speech, an address he gave in 2004 at an NAACP ceremony to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the Brown v Board of Education US supreme court decision. Cosby took the time to chastise black Americans for what he viewed as failures, including the use of Ebonics, the number of single-parent households, wasteful spending and conspicuous consumption, and certain sartorial choices.
The most memorable line, the one that earned the speech its name, found Cosby almost excusing the violence perpetrated on black people by the police when he said:
"People getting shot in the back of the head over a piece of pound cake! And then we all run out and are outraged, 'The cops shouldn't have shot him.' What the hell was he doing with the pound cake in his hand?"
There was much backlash over his comments, many feeling as though Cosby had gone out of his way to berate and embarrass low-income black people for lack of personal responsibility, while refusing to address the ways in which the issues of racism and class have impacted their lives. This line of thinking is not new, nor specific to Cosby, as calls for personal responsibility have been integral parts of black liberation struggles from the time of Reconstruction – made most famous by Booker T Washington.
But Cosby dismissed the role racism plays in our post-civil rights world in a way that is potentially dangerous. He's doing the same now in his public remarks on the killing of Trayvon Martin.
In an interview with the Washington Times, Cosby was asked whether Martin's death at the hands of George Zimmerman was about race. He replied:
"Without a gun, I don't see Mr Zimmerman approaching Trayvon by himself … The power-of-the-gun mentality had him unafraid to confront someone. Even police call for backup in similar situations."
Cosby went on to say:
"When you carry a gun, you mean to harm somebody, kill somebody."
Reiterating this stance on NBC's Meet the Press, Cosby said:
"It's about the gun … guns in our country."
Cosby, of course, has a particular sensitivity to the issue of guns and gun violence, since his son, Ennis Cosby, was shot and killed during a robbery attempt in 1997. Undoubtedly, there is a need to have an honest discussion about the role guns play in our society, when you consider, as Gary Younge reports, there are approximately 90 guns for every 100 people in the US and more than 85 people a day are killed by them. Cosby's concern should be all of ours.
But his downplaying the role race played in the killing of Trayvon Martin is not something we can afford. From the outset of the national outrage, Zimmerman's father attempted to dismiss any charge of discrimination, or profiling, pointing to his son's ethnic background and mentoring of black children as refutation of racial prejudice. Self-appointed black friend Joe Oliver became a surrogate on cable news, trying to absolve Zimmerman of any charges of racism.
It has never mattered whether Zimmerman personally is a racist, but from what we can hear of his 911 call and can establish from his pattern of reporting suspicious figures in the neighborhood where he shot and killed Martin, it's clear that he operated on racial stereotypes. When calling to alert authorities to Martin's presence, Zimmerman told the 911 dispatcher that he looked suspicious, like "he's on drugs or something"; but he had little other information about him other than he was black. The indignation in the phrase "these assholes, they always get away", Zimmerman muttered as he left his vehicle to pursue Martin suggests this wasn't just about Martin, but about all of those people, whether black, teen, tall, skinny, hoodie-wearing or what have you, whom Zimmerman had determined were criminals. And when you consider that Zimmerman had a history of calling 911 to report black males, including once finding a juvenile aged 7-9 suspicious, it isn't hard to figure out who the perceived threats were in his mind.
What Cosby, and others who would have us focus less on Martin's race and more on other factors contributing to his death, would prefer is that we operate as a color-blind society. But if we choose not to see race, then it is impossible to see actual racism – and there is plenty of it to go around. When we ignore that, it makes it possible for Newt Gingrich to feign outrage at President Barack Obama's observation that if he had a son, "he would look like Trayvon," and suggest the president would not care if this were to have happened to a white teenager. The real problem is that this likely would not have happened to a white teenager, yet is a reality young black Americans live with daily.
There isn't a single issue at play here. Yes, this is about a culture of guns. It is about the "Stand Your Ground" law, that may still provide a viable defense for Zimmerman. This is about the ineptitude of the Sanford, Florida police department.
Those issues, though, can be resolved in Congress, statehouses and courts. What killed Trayvon cannot be legislated away. It is the product of centuries of vicious messaging about the nature of black men. As well-meaning as color-blind politics may be, if it cannot address that reality, it will always fail.
It was Malcolm X who said:
"If you stick a knife in my back nine inches and pull it out six inches, that's not progress. If you pull it all the way out, that's not progress. The progress comes from healing the wound that the blow made. They haven't even begun to pull the knife out, much less heal the wound. They won't even admit the knife is there."
We can't afford to act like we don't see the knife. The wound won't heal if we continue to look away.

Wednesday, April 18, 2012

Doing things for ourselves

 
Kansuke Yamamoto    
  
Later with Jools Holland was back on the BBC 2, last night; it was lovely to see, especially as Paul Weller started the show with a brilliant number.

This Friday we will be able to hear him do several more numbers, as Friday is always the longer show.

After a good nights sleep, I was immensely cheered up by seeing an article in the Guardian newspaper, about the collusion of the Blair government in sending suspects by special rendition to other countries to be interrogated using torture.

The Guardian article reports that the former Home Secretary Jack Straw will be facing legal action over claims he sent two Libyans, by special rendition to be tortured in Libya.

Hopefully Tony Blair will also face charges; he should also be facing charges, for backing the illegal war in Iraq.

Tony Blair along with George Bush Jr, Dick Cheney, and Donald Rumsfeld should all be on trial for the illegal war; purely it seems for personal gain.

Many thousands of Iraqi people were murdered, their communities destroyed; and what was once a thriving country has been virtually ruined.

What was a modern secular state is now a sectarian fundamentalist society, thanks to Blair and Bush’s illegal invasion and war, which has totally destabilised the entire region.

Purely for the oil revenues that they could get their hands on, this was the same story in Libya, action in return for a very large slice of the oil revenue.

No wonder they're not rushing into Syria, no large reserves of oil to interest them there.

They're however not too worried, as Burma is finally also pretending to play the democracy game, in the hope that sanctions will be lifted.

This would open up the country, to development by companies from overseas, to come in and invest in infrastructure.

That would make it possible for those companies and the Burmese ruling elite, the generals to exploit the country's tremendous natural resources.

The worlds ruling elites, don't care who they do business with, as long as it is business which gives them only, even more profits.

That is after all, the only thing they truly care about, which is keeping themselves and their friends, the other ruling elites in power.

So that they, can carry on accumulating the worlds natural resources, purely for themselves and at all our expenses.

Democracy encourages us to believe our vote’s matter that they make a difference, they don’t, and they just keep the pretence going of one day things will improve.

Things will only improve, if we make them happen for ourselves, we are the only ones who want changes, the ruling elites and their associates don’t want changes to their status as our leaders.



Jack Straw faces legal action over Libya rendition claims.


Libyan commander Abdel Hakim Belhaj takes legal action against former foreign secretary, alleging complicity in his torture

guardian.co.uk

Jack Straw: civil action seeks to examine former foreign secretary's role in Belhaj's return to Libya. Photograph: Stefan Wermuth/Reuters
A former Libyan dissident who was abducted and flown to one of Muammar Gaddafi's prisons in a so-called rendition operation mounted with the help of MI6 has started legal proceedings against Jack Straw, who was British foreign secretary at the time.
Lawyers representing Abdel Hakim Belhaj confirmed on Wednesday they had served papers on Straw alleging his complicity in the torture that Belhaj subsequently suffered, as well as misfeasance in public office.
Straw is already facing the prospect of being questioned by Scotland Yard detectives after an announcement by the Crown Prosecution Service earlier this year that a criminal investigation was being launched into the rendition operation.
Belhaj and his wife are alleging that Straw was complicit in the "torture, inhuman and degrading treatment, batteries and assaults" that they say were perpetrated on them by Thai and US agents, as well as Libyan authorities.
They are seeking damages from Straw for the trauma they suffered.
Documents discovered in an abandoned Libyan government office last September outlined the role that MI6 – and in particular its head of counterterrorism, Mark Allen – played in providing the intelligence that allowed the CIA to detain Belhaj and his pregnant wife, Fatima Bouchar, in Bangkok in March 2004.
Last week, Bouchar told the Guardian how she was chained to a wall for five days in a secret prison in Bangkok before being taped from head to foot and secured to a stretcher for the 17-hour flight to Tripoli.
Significantly, MI6 did not deny involvement when the documents were discovered: instead, well-placed Whitehall sources insisted the agency's actions were part of "ministerially authorised government policy".
There were reports at the weekend that MI6 confronted Straw with evidence that he was the minister who personally authorised the operation. This is said to have happened after Straw gave a radio interview last year in which he sought to distance himself from the affair, telling listeners that "no foreign secretary can know all the details of what its intelligence agencies are doing at any one time".
Those reports triggered the decision by Belhaj's lawyers to serve legal papers on the former foreign secretary. Those papers also demand that Straw disclose documents relating to the rendition of a second Libyan dissident, Sami al-Saadi, who was abducted and flown to Libya a few days after Belhaj, along with his wife and four children.
Although Belhaj's lawyers have already launched proceedings against the British government, the latest action is against Straw personally, and is thought to be the first time proceedings of this kind have been taken against a former foreign secretary.
If the case reaches court, it would be exactly the sort of proceedings that would be heard behind closed doors, under the justice ministry's much-criticised secret justice proposals, which some ministers say are needed to protect national security, but which critics suspect are intended to protect the government and intelligence agencies from embarrassment.
Sapna Malik, of the London law firm Leigh Day, said: "We have said all along that liability must follow the chain of command. These latest revelations bring us closer to that goal. If the former foreign secretary does not now own up to his role in this extraordinary affair, he will need to face the prospect of trying to defend his position in court."
Cori Crider, of the legal charity Reprieve, which is also representing the two men, said: "When scandals like this break, the political paymasters almost never face the music. For once, there's a chance things might be different.
"We've said from the start that the minister responsible for this mess needed to admit their role. Now that we seem to know who it was, it's time for Jack Straw to account – and atone – for what he did."
Contacted on Wednesday, Straw said he had nothing to add to comments he made during the radio interview.
MI6 regularly requests foreign secretaries to "disapply" UK law in order to protect its officers from being prosecuted or sued in the UK as a result of their operations overseas. The authorisations can be signed only by secretaries of state, and do not offer any protection for those politicians.
Last week, Tony Blair also faced renewed questions about the abduction of Belhaj and his wife. He replied that he had "no recollection" of the matter.

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

Finally Good News



Victor Reinganum

 Last night I felt much better after, Richie told me the good news that finally there seemed to be some progress.

Really brilliant, and just when I was starting to lose hope that there was any perspective of there being any signs that the healing was carrying on.

Initially it looked like it would be healed very quickly, when Richie mentioned this on 22 February, I have a sinking feeling listening to his words.

It reminded me too much of January 2010, when I had been sitting for just six weeks, a new cushion for the shower chair caused so much friction that the pressure sore scar was ripped open.

At the time, Ton, the wonderful nurse from the rehabilitation clinic, said that it won't take more than a couple weeks to heal.

Then I was in bed from 14 January until the end of April, and then I sat for about 10 days before the scar burst open again.

This kept happening every two weeks, and then I would have to stay in bed again until it was healed.

This went on until August 2010 and when finally it was closed and I could sit in my wheelchair again.

So hearing Richie tell me that it wasn't much, and it would be healed very quickly filled me with dread.

The thought of being in bed so long again, filled me with dread, so Richie’s news last night was the best I had heard for sometime.

Then I just saw that the best music program Later with  Jools Holland is back on BBC 2 TV for a new serie, suddenly life is even better.  




AP Wins Pulitzer for Exposing NYPD’s CIA-Linked Intel Program, Leading Widespread Spying on Muslims


 

We speak with Matt Apuzzo, co-author of the Associated Press series that revealed the New York City Police Department has extensively spied on Muslim Americans not only in the tri-city area, but throughout the eastern United States. The series won the 2012 Pulitzer Prize for Investigative Reporting. Beginning last August, the AP detailed how the NYPD established a vast operation to monitor Muslim neighborhoods after the 9/11 attacks. Hundreds of mosques, businesses and Muslim student groups were investigated, monitored and, in many cases, infiltrated. Police observed and cataloged daily life in Muslim communities, from where people ate and shopped to where they worked and prayed. Police used informants, known as "mosque crawlers," to monitor sermons, even without any evidence of wrongdoing. Also falling under NYPD’s scrutiny were imams, cab drivers and food cart vendors. According to the AP, many of these operations were built with help from the CIA, which is prohibited from spying on Americans. In the process, the NYPD became "one of the nation’s most aggressive domestic intelligence agencies," targeting ethnic communities in ways that would run afoul of civil liberties rules if practiced by the federal government. The revelations sparked a national controversy that only grew as the AP continued to reveal more details of the NYPD’s actions. "We try to provide that information so people can make informed decisions," Apuzzo says. "This wasn’t a series we set out to do ... I think it continues if more information makes itself available. And we’ll go where the story leads."

http://www.democracynow.org/2012/4/17/ap_wins_pulitzer_for_exposing_growth

Norway’s Johan Galtung, Peace & Conflict Pioneer, Reflects on Norwegian Massacre, Afghan War
Today is the second day of the trial of Anders Behring Breivik, the anti-Muslim Norwegian militant who massacred 77 people last summer. Breivik is on trial for setting off a car bomb that killed eight people at government headquarters in Oslo last July, then killing 69 in a shooting spree at a summer youth camp on an island organized by the ruling Labour Party. On the first day of his trial, Breivik admitted to carrying out the killings but pleaded not guilty to criminal charges. He gave a clenched-fist salute and said he acted to defend his country against Muslims. Later in the hearing, Breivick broke into tears when prosecutors showed an anti-Muslim video he had posted to YouTube shortly before his killing spree. As the trial continues in Norway, we are joined by Norwegian sociologist and mathematician, Johan Galtung who is regarded as the principal founder of the discipline of peace and conflict studies. His granddaughter was on the island when Breivik attacked.

http://www.democracynow.org/2012/4/17/norways_johan_galtung_peace_conflict_pioneer
--

Monday, April 16, 2012

Finally Progress

Victor Reinganum, 1944.


When Richie brought me a delicious plate of freshly made pasta Carbonari, he had some good news for me.

The good news is, that there is considerable progress in the healing of the tear in the old pressure sore scar.

It seems that the new strategy, is working, it has worked as an acceleratant, just as Milou thought it would.

It is such good news, just what I wanted to hear, but I was scared that I wasn't going to hear Richie saying that for quite some time.

I'm so pleased, I really am so pleased, and funnily enough I just posted yesterday's post, which needed editing and a title as well as labels.

My title was some perspective of positive development, then an hour later Richie says, he has some good news for me.

Suddenly I have a perspective of a positive development, which is just amazing, this certainly puts a different perspective on everything.

I think I shall sleep so much better than recently and I shall be able to cope with the meeting tomorrow with the rehabilitation doctor and my
occupational therapist.

This really has given me a tremendous boost, which I really needed right now, hopefully now I should be able to enjoy time outside this summer.

I'm feeling optimistic and am looking forward to enjoying this summer with my darling Richie and our friends.

Silvio Berlusconi trial hears of women dressed as nuns stripping




Italian former PM's parties shocked me, says Imane Fadil adding that she was later warned to keep quiet by a 'mysterious' man
Tom Kington in Rome
guardian.co.uk

Imane Fadil alleged in court that one of the women dressed as nun was Nicole Minetti, a former TV showgirl now regional councillor for Silvio Berlusconi's party. Photograph: Daniele Mascolo/EPA
A model testifying at Silvio Berlusconi's trial for paying an underage prostitute has given dramatic evidence of young women dressed as nuns and footballers stripping at the former prime minister's parties, and has claimed she was warned not to speak about what she had seen.
Moroccan Imane Fadil, 27, told the court she watched as two young women donned black habits and crucifixes to perform a pole dance before stripping to their underwear. At another party, a Brazilian model wearing a mask of the footballer Ronaldinho and an AC Milan shirt stripped to her G-string.
Fadil is one of at least three women who have come forward to deny Berlusconi's claims that his "bunga bunga" parties at his mansion outside Milan in 2010 were more than just "elegant dinners".
Shocked at what she saw at her first party, Fadil said Berlusconi took her into his office and handed her a watch, earrings and €2,000 (£1,650) in an envelope, stating: "Don't be offended, but I know you women are always in need."
Fadil said she declined to stay the night, and claimed the women who did were paid more for sex. "The girls complained they were afraid of diseases," she said. "But they all competed to stay because whoever stayed earned a lot more."
The nights, she said, were arranged by Nicole Minetti, a former TV showgirl  now regional councillor for Berlusconi's party – who was one of those allegedly dressed as a nun – and Emilio Fede, a former newscaster on one of his TV channels.
Both are separately standing trial for procuring prostitutes for Berlusconi, who stepped down as prime minister in November.
Berlusconi's trial, which started last April, centres on his relationship with Moroccan runaway Karima el-Mahroug, known as Ruby the Heart Stealer, who attended parties aged 17. Paying a prostitute under 18 is illegal in Italy. Berlusconi is also charged with pressuring police to hush up the case.
He has said large sums of money he gave to Mahroug were to prevent her straying into prostitution, while he has also claimed he believed she was a relative of former Egyptian leader Hosni Mubarak.
Fadil, who is also a Moroccan national, said that on one occasion a fellow party guest had told her Mahroug had "extremely compromising" photos and videos of the parties.
After news of Berlusconi's parties emerged, Fadil said she was repeatedly contacted by a "mysterious" blond, blue-eyed man who invited her to a meeting at Berlusconi's mansion and gave her an untraceable mobile phone to stay in touch.
She told the court: "That person threatened me and told me, 'If you say something about our meeting, it's your business.'" Asked by Berlusconi's lawyers why she had not spoken before of the meetings, Fadil replied: "I was scared, and I am scared today to walk out of this courtroom."
After refusing to meet Berlusconi. Fadil said she was contacted by Fede. "He made me understand that I should not talk about what I had seen," she said.

Sunday, April 15, 2012

Some Perspective of Positive Developments


The Golden Egg, 1967.
Victor  Reinganum

It is wonderful that I am sitting here with the television on and I'm watching Chelsea playing Tottenham Hotspurs, a proper London Derby.

Really can't be bad; television and dictating at the same time, pretty good, plus the sun is actually shining.

It is the end of the day, amazingly it’s already 19.21, and it really is wonderful how quickly we get used to the evenings being lighter.

I love that the days have got longer, almost without my noticing, this really is my favourite time of year when everything is growing again now winter is over.

How I wish I was also coming back to life too, our good friend Cecile, recently got the all clear after five years, it is good to know she is clear of cancer now.aaaa

How l wish I was clear of Multiple Sclerosis, I wish we all were, if only there were some perspective of positive developments in the research as to the cause of the disease.e

 It would be great to either being able to be totally cured or at least there was a properly tested drug that really slows down the effects of this horrible disease.

If only the research into the causes of MS, could finally work out why Multiple Sclerosis occurs, then I would feel confident about taking the disease modification drugs.

While the Pharmapheutical companies have no idea what causes Multiple Sclerosis, and no idea of what their medicines do to people, I've no intention of taking their drugs.

I have no intention of taking any medication, where I'm not sure how it will affect me, I keep hearing so often about blog friends taking medication that seems to make things worse not better for them.

I get really quite sad, when I read about friends, on disease modification drugs, which just seems to make them worse not better.
           
Sadly just like with any medication, once you start taking it, it is difficult to stop again, I know this myself.

It happens often that as soon as I taken one sleeping tablet, I often feel like I should take one the next night too, but I don't, that’s how addictions start.

I think it's more difficult to get off described medicines, recently there have been quite a few deaths reported in the media, of various celebrities dying as a result of prescription drugs.

People don't seem to think that you can be addicted to drugs prescribed by the doctor; they think that because they're from a doctor they must be all right.

Nothing could be further from the truth, pharmaceutical companies are just drug dealers, and the only difference is, that they are legal.

Just like the other legal drug companies, which sell alcohol and tobacco, all extremely addictive drugs, the only difference is that they too are legal.

Funnily enough all of these legal drugs cause many more deaths, than the illegal drugs have ever caused, hopefully the misguided action against illegal drugs will stop in the near future and countries will legalise the illegal drugs.

This will hopefully stop the ridiculous prohibition of drugs, and stop criminalising people, and filling the prisons with thousands of innocent people who are not allowed to choose for themselves.

The opportunity cost of the misguided ’war’ against drugs, has denied people and their communities so much money, which would have been better spent giving people the lives they needed and deserved.  

Web freedom faces greatest threat ever, warns Google's Sergey Brin



Exclusive: Threats range from governments trying to control citizens to the rise of Facebook and Apple-style 'walled garden
guardian.co.uk

Sergey Brin says he and Google co-founder Larry Page would not have been able to create their search giant if the internet was dominated by Facebook. Photograph: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
The principles of openness and universal access that underpinned the creation of the internet three decades ago are under greater threat than ever, according to Google co-founder Sergey Brin.
In an interview with the Guardian, Brin warned that there were "very powerful forces that have lined up against the open internet on all sides and around the world. I am more worried than I have been in the past … it's scary."
He said the threat to the freedom of the internet came from a combination of governments increasingly trying to control access and communication by their citizens, the entertainment industry attempting to crack down on piracy, and the rise of "restrictive" so-called walled gardens such as Facebook and Apple, which tightly controlled what software could be released on their platforms.
The 38-year-old billionaire, whose family fled antisemitism in the Soviet Union, was widely regarded as having been the driving force behind Google's partial pullout from China in 2010 over concerns about censorship and cyber-attacks.
He said five years ago he did not believe China or any country could effectively restrict the internet for long but he had been proven wrong: "I thought there was no way to put the genie back in the bottle, but now it seems in certain areas the genie has been put back in the bottle."
Although he said he was most concerned by the efforts of countries such as China, Saudi Arabia and Iran to censor and restrict use of the internet, he also warned that the rise of Facebook and Apple, which have their own proprietary platforms and control access to their users, risked stifling innovation and Balkanising the web.
"There's a lot to be lost," he said. "For example all the information in apps – that data is not crawlable by web crawlers. You can't search it."
Brin's criticism of Facebook is likely to be seen as controversial with the social network approaching an estimated $100bn flotation. Google's upstart rival has seen explosive growth, with more than 800 million members worldwide and one in two of all Americans with computer access signed up.
Brin said he and co-founder Larry Page would not have been able to create Google if the internet was dominated by Facebook. "You have to play by their rules, which are really restrictive. The kind of environment that we developed Google in, the reason that we were able to develop a search engine, is the web was so open. Once you get too many rules that will stifle innovation."
He also criticised Facebook for not making it easy for users to switch their data to other services. "Facebook has been sucking down Gmail contacts for many years."
Brin's comments come on the first day of a week-long Guardian investigation of the intensifying battle for control of the internet that is being played out across the globe between governments, companies, military strategists, activists and hackers.
From Hollywood's attempts to pass legislation allowing pirate websites to be shut down, to the British government's plans to monitor social media and web use, the ethos of openness championed by the pioneers of the internet and world wide web is being challenged on a number of fronts.
In China, which now has more internet users than any country in the world, the government recently introduced new "real identity" rules in a bid to tame the country's boisterous micro-blogging scene. In Russia there are powerful calls to rein in a blogosphere that was blamed for fomenting a wave of anti-Putin protests. It has been reported that Iran is planning to introduce a sealed "national internet" from this summer.
Ricken Patel, co-founder of Avaaz, the 14 million-strong online activist network which has been providing communication equipment and training to Syrian activists, echoed Brin's warning: "We've seen a massive attack on the freedom of the web. Governments are realising the power of this medium to organise people and they are trying to clamp down across the world, not just in places like China and North Korea; we're seeing bills in the United States, in Italy, all across the world."
Writing in the Guardian today, outspoken Chinese artist and activist Ai Weiwei says the Chinese government's attempts to control the internet will ultimately be doomed to failure. "In the long run they must understand it's not possible for them to control the internet unless they shut it off – and they can't live with the consequences of that."
Brin said he was not surprised by the effectiveness with which China had so far managed to create a technological barrier against the outside world. "I'm more surprised by the acceptance … I had imagined people would be more rebellious."
Amid mounting concern over the militarisation of the internet and claims (denied by Beijing) that China has mounted numerous cyber-attacks on US military and corporate targets, he said it would be hugely difficult for any government to defend its online "territory".
"If you compare the internet to the physical world, there really aren't any walls between countries. If Canada wanted to send tanks into the US there is nothing stopping them and it's the same on the internet: it's hopeless to try to control the internet."
He reserved his harshest words for the entertainment industry, which he said was "shooting itself in the foot, or maybe worse than in the foot" by lobbying for legislation to block sites offering pirate material.
He said the SOPA and PIPA bills championed by Hollywood and the music industry would have led to the US using the same technology and approach it criticised China and Iran for using. The entertainment industry failed to appreciate that people would continue to download pirated content as long as it was easier to acquire and use than legitimately obtained material, he said.
"I haven't tried it for many years but when you go on a pirate website, you choose what you like, it downloads to the device of your choice and it will just work – and then when you have to jump through all these hoops [to buy legitimate content], the walls created are disincentives for people to buy."
Brin acknowleged that some people were anxious about the amount of their data that was now in the reach of US authorities because it sits on Google's servers. He said the company was periodically forced to hand over data and sometimes prevented by legal restrictions from even notifying users that it had done so.
He said: "We push back a lot; we are able to turn down a lot of these requests. We do everything possible to protect the data. If we could wave a magic wand and not be subject to US law, that would be great. If we could be in some magical jurisdiction that everyone in the world trusted, that would be great … We're doing it as well as can be done."